When is a rant not a rant?

[riser3]

When it is a legal opinion: http://bradblog.com/Docs/JudgePosner..._WI_101014.pdf

I'm on page 25 of 43. It is worth a read.

[riser3]

Pure. Gold. From page 26.

"As there is no evidence that voter impersonation fraud is a problem, how can the fact that a legislature says it’s a problem turn it into one? If the Wisconsin legislature says witches are a problem, shall Wisconsin courts be permitted to conduct witch trials?"

[Baaahb]

Yep, pretty darn impressive. Ain't read it but read about it.

[riser3]

After reflecting on my quote above regarding witch trials and remembering that this is about Wisconsin, it all makes sense. The home of Joseph McCarthy. Of course there will be witch trials.

[riser3]

Oh. Do read the good judge's opinion. It is really only 30 and one half pages. And those really aren't full pages. Good stuff.