Double Pole Plant?

[Chugach001]

Way to go Craig. I still miss Couloir.

[Tele 'til You're Smelly]

I am highly in favor- it's like getting twice the turns in!

[meadowskipper]

did someone say, "double pole plant"?

[mulex]

So where the hell is Ron?

[stevesliva]

Oh, he'll show up eventually.

[yersinlepoleAunt]

I am only here to say that N**** B** is an overly sensitive
manipulative little b***h. I promised Biff, whom I
admire and respect, not to tease other T-east forum members..
So there ya go..Now carry on with your intolerant trivialities..
Where the hell is Cesare? I miss Cesare.. .. And Mr T..
I don't really miss Hdippy..I would miss James, but he's an a$$hole..
I don't miss any of you other dumb a$$holes --too many to list.. Cheers
Thanks Dustie!
Pleas pm me y'all..I need something to delete!
O yea, where the hell is FHW ? Must have locked him up
after the big Ttips crash..

[Dostie]

So where the hell is Ron?

Oh, he'll show up eventually.

He just did. I recognize the truncated lines and prose.

Consider yourself warned singlepoleRon. You started off with a personal insult in your first line, plus a word I considered worthy of auto censorship, then added a few more insults. The first is the more serious infraction in my book and will not be tolerated.

NO Slander! Period. Get it?

We're here to celebrate backcountry skiing, uphill, downhill, locked heel, free heeled, and sideways. Insults can be tolerated as a joke among friends where the humor in truth is tempered by friendship that is earned, just like our turns.

Actually, now that I think about it, the warning will last as long as it takes me to transition from poster to the admin on the back end. IOW - just a fast hand slap then a time out. I'll let you back in after you consider the ramifications of your actions (the intent of your words).

What's the jury say on the timeframe?

[dschane]

It's not him. He may be prone to over-posting, susceptible to goading, and capable of irritating many, but he wouldn't launch an opening salvo of such douche-baggery (not that I really know the guy).

But, no harm in exercising your powers of banishment either.

[Oldschooldropout]

It's not him. He may be prone to over-posting, susceptible to goading, and capable of irritating many, but he wouldn't launch an opening salvo of such douche-baggery (not that I really know the guy).

But, no harm in exercising your powers of banishment either.

I agree. Not enough Latin. And almost lucid.

[bobs]

I should note, for fans of my "Uncopulate" script, that this site has an Ignore List. I just tested it out, and it works! Just go to Settings, and find "Edit Ignore List", then enter the user name (using the paste function makes it easy).

[telorti]

Yes!!!!!!!!!! I think "uncopulate" (thanks bobs) and "mondo pita" are great but an ignore function is easier to use than either of those.

[Carpe Canem]

NO Slander! Period. Get it?

What's the jury say on the timeframe?

Well Played Dostie!

[Nurse Ben]

Honestly, I already put him on ignore, so for me he is history.

It's really hard to keep Ron banned, he'll keep coming back in different guises.

The ignore function works for me, if I don't see the baiting comment, I won't become part of the fishing expedition.

[bobs]

It's really hard to keep Ron banned, he'll keep coming back in different guises.

You're right that people shouldn't bait and/or feed the trolls. And needless to say, I'm a big fan of the "Ignore" feature.

But I disagree that it's some kind of inalienable right to come back right after being banned with some new ID. Sorry, no, that's abuse of the site. If a spammer comes along, you aren't going to say "Hi, MexicanPharmacy1234, congratulations on solving the 'sevenminusfive' captcha, welcome and have fun!" No, they're an abuser, not a user, and it's up to the mods to smack that **** down early and often. Same with someone using sockpuppets to evade a ban. The admin has email and IP addresses, and can make a reasonable guess if some new user who's suddenly posting 10 times a day is one of a small handful of infamous problem users who he's already gone to the trouble of deciding to ban.

While I'm on the subject, people having a bevy of sock-puppets for the express purpose of agreeing with one's self and creating a faux consensus on some point, is also site abuse, in my opinion. And pathetic. Mitch was active at the time that one individual used something like a half-dozen sock-puppets to turn the Royal Gorge XC topic into a 20+ page ideological train wreck, something that should have embarrassed Mitch and anyone else who cared about the site.

[jarlybart]

Did somebody say Double Pole? ;-)

http://youtu.be/3H4se6KSP8A